<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>some thoughts about *nix</title>
	<link>http://ux.ennuie.org</link>
	<description>and others about anything else</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>features of zfs</title>
		<link>http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/07/17/features-of-zfs/</link>
		<comments>http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/07/17/features-of-zfs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>georg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/07/17/features-of-zfs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here you can find a good overview on the features of a advanced filesystem: OpenSolaris 2008.11 - A Preview For The Storage Admin
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here you can find a good overview on the features of a advanced filesystem: <a href="http://elektronkind.org/2008/07/opensolaris-2008-11-storage" title="OpenSolaris 2008.11 - A Preview For The Storage Admin" target="_blank">OpenSolaris 2008.11 - A Preview For The Storage Admin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/07/17/features-of-zfs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>linux-next?</title>
		<link>http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/07/16/linux-next/</link>
		<comments>http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/07/16/linux-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>georg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/07/16/linux-next/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even if not meaning exactly that, a lot of the topics Anrew Morton addressed in a presentation at the &#8216;Japan Linux Symposion&#8217; in July 2008 (Andrew Symposion) are pointing in that direction. What is lacking and what is coming next?
In regard to technology, Andrew points out some very important things for the next years:

Filesystems
 Memory [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if not meaning exactly that, a lot of the topics Anrew Morton addressed in a presentation at the &#8216;Japan Linux Symposion&#8217; in July 2008 (<a href="http://www.linux-foundation.jp/uploads/seminar20080709/Andrew-symposium-2008.pdf" title="Andrew Syposion" target="_blank">Andrew Symposion</a>) are pointing in that direction. What is lacking and what is coming next?</p>
<p>In regard to technology, Andrew points out some very important things for the next years:</p>
<ul>
<li>Filesystems</li>
<li> Memory management</li>
<li>OS virtualization (container)</li>
<li>Resource control (per container resource control)</li>
<li>Tracing</li>
</ul>
<p>In general, his summary is a little bit frustrating - have a look at it yourself. More on that soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/07/16/linux-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>the pain of updating opensolaris</title>
		<link>http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/07/15/the-pain-of-updating-opensolaris/</link>
		<comments>http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/07/15/the-pain-of-updating-opensolaris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>georg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/07/15/the-pain-of-updating-opensolaris/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes - it is really a pain. Although I like OpenSolaris the procedure of updating it can be improved a lot. The package server itself seems to be not very reliable: each update run has to be restarted several times: and even more worse - it cannot be restarted. Imagine: after downloading about 1.3G for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes - it is really a pain. Although I like OpenSolaris the procedure of updating it can be improved a lot. The package server itself seems to be not very reliable: each update run has to be restarted several times: and even more worse - it cannot be restarted. Imagine: after downloading about 1.3G for updating your process aborts and you need to download all that stuff again.</p>
<p><a href="http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/07/15/the-pain-of-updating-opensolaris/opensolaris-update/" rel="attachment wp-att-5" title="opensolaris-update"><img src="http://ux.ennuie.org/__oneclick_uploads/2008/07/screenshot-terminal.jpg" alt="opensolaris-update" /></a></p>
<p>There is really a lot of need for improvement - at least, the process should be restartable at that point he got the error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/07/15/the-pain-of-updating-opensolaris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>finally I succeeded - OpenSolaris 2008.05 update to snv_91</title>
		<link>http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/06/22/finally-i-succeeded-opensolaris-200805-update-to-snv_91/</link>
		<comments>http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/06/22/finally-i-succeeded-opensolaris-200805-update-to-snv_91/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>georg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/06/22/finally-i-succeeded-opensolaris-200805-update-to-snv_91/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was a little bit a pain: updating always timed out, even if &#8216;PKG_CLIENT_TIMEOUT&#8217; was set to a much higher value than the default. The update server &#8216;pkg.opensolaris.org&#8217; did not seem to be very reliable - hopefully it is not running opensolaris itself.
However finally I succeeded - and I am now on snv_91:

More on OpenSolaris [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a little bit a pain: updating always timed out, even if &#8216;PKG_CLIENT_TIMEOUT&#8217; was set to a much higher value than the default. The update server &#8216;pkg.opensolaris.org&#8217; did not seem to be very reliable - hopefully it is not running opensolaris itself.</p>
<p>However finally I succeeded - and I am now on snv_91:</p>
<p><center><a href="http://ux.ennuie.org/__oneclick_uploads/2008/06/update1-2.jpg" title="OpenSolaris 2008.05 update-2"><img src="http://ux.ennuie.org/__oneclick_uploads/2008/06/update1-2.jpg" alt="OpenSolaris 2008.05 update-2" /></a></center><br />
More on OpenSolaris soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ux.ennuie.org/2008/06/22/finally-i-succeeded-opensolaris-200805-update-to-snv_91/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
